| Andy さんのプロフィールThe Blatant Expositor: H...ブログリスト | ヘルプ |
|
The Blatant Expositor: Home of the BEACON© AwardsIlluminating Spaces that glorify the cyberealm 4月3日 Winners ArchiveHere are all the winners of BEACON since its inauguration in January 2006. The winners are highlighted in bold. Honourable mentions are underlined. Keep in mind this archive is a perpetual work in progress to be updated by the month. Enjoy.
[2006]
[Most Popular Space]
[Most Underated Space]
[Best Photo]
[Best Original Creative Piece - Art, Poem, Cartoon or Other]
An Experiment in Normality - "Chirp" Drawing
Djartistknight, Breaks in the House - Asurman, Eldar Phoenix Lord deviantArt
Lakota Clay - "Transformations" Poem
Live, Laugh, Learn and Most of All Love - Empty Sheets Blog
Live, Laugh, Learn and Most of All Love - Girl Blog
[Best Political, Satirical or Witty Blog]
Click Here! - Please CHOOSE the Most Correct Answer
Click Here - I Have No Friends
Don't Panic - The Stupidisation of Our Youth Presses Ever Forward
Pie-Eyed Ostrich on Toast - Seagulls - Mafiosos of the Birdie World
The New Flump Website - That's No Murderous A-Moral-Republican-Pedophile-Klansman! That's My Wife!
[Funniest Blog]
[Best Thought-Provoking or Reflective Blog]
[Blog of the Year]
[BEACON Space of the Year]
Vox PopFor all your complaints, comments, concerns or queries, feel free to pollute the space below. The joys of cyber-pollution!
Questions will be responded to in this section so keep aprise.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards The Blessed CategoriesAs with any other awards event, there are certain categories for participants to pit themselves against others in. With BEACON, it is all about honouring and sharing cyberspace excellence with others. It does make for a good exhibition of all your unique talents (right word, just checking) for one so reclusive such as I. I merely have to sift through them all! Ah, the life of the Director!
These categories are gloriously subject to change. However, these categories have been selected in consideration of mainstream values and accessability. All articles entered into BEACON must have been posted onto Spaces during the previous calendar year. For example in the year 2007, only objects posted from 1 January - 31 December 2006 are eligible. Of course, the beauty of BEACON is that the categories occur in random order, meaning you won't know which category will be chosen. The only way to dominate at BEACON is to update your Space accordingy in all areas. It is about celebrating excellence, isn't it? Well excellence is synonymous with variety here...
Each category is divided in a tier system hiearchy, affording the winner some exclusive Tier 3 Award privileges as well as an award. More on those privileges here. Anyhow, the categories and their awards are as follows:
[TIER ONE AWARDS]
1. The Media Mogul Award for Best Review of Media
2. The Happy Snapper Award for Best Original Photo (Created or Real)
3. The Blog Idol Award for Most Popular Space
4. The Boost Your Ego Award for Most Underated Space
[TIER TWO AWARDS]
1. The Side Splitter Award for Funniest Blog
2. The Onion Award for Most Thought-Provoking or Reflective Blog
3. The Punch Line Award for Best Political, Witty or Satirical Blog
4. The Modern Protege Award for Best Original Creative Piece (Poem, Cartoon, Drawing, Art or Other)
[TIER THREE AWARDS]
1. The Golden Hand Award* for Best Blog of the Year
2. The Spotlight Award* for Best Space of the Year
The three tier system also affects point distribution. Each tier affords different amounts of points for wins, nominations and honourable mentions. See this guide for details about the revised point system. That's all.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards The Country Club Chooses Its Members - The Tier 3 AwardsPlease read the guide on the BEACON categories before reading this to prevent confusion. It can be found here.
As you may know, BEACON categories are divided into a three-tier arrangement. They are summarised below:
[TIER ONE AWARDS]
1. The Media Mogul Award for Best Review of Media
2. The Happy Snapper Award for Best Original Photo (Created or Real)
3. The Blog Idol Award for Most Popular Space
4. The Boost Your Ego Award for Most Underated Space
[TIER TWO AWARDS]
1. The Side Splitter Award for Funniest Blog
2. The Onion Award for Most Thought-Provoking or Reflective Blog
3. The Punch Line Award for Best Political, Witty or Satirical Blog
4. The Modern Protege Award for Best Original Creative Piece (Poem, Cartoon, Drawing, Art or Other)
[TIER THREE AWARDS]
1. The Golden Hand Award for Best Blog of the Year
2. The Spotlight Award for Best Space of the Year The Blog Of The Year Category
This category only contains five nominees. It is comprised of the three winners from the three "Blog" Awards from Tier Two (except Best Original Creative Piece) leaving two slots empty. These remaining slots are determined by the wildcard system. Wildcards are awarded to BEACON contenders who submit another article of work designed to impress the Director. However, in the case of the Blog of the Year Award, it must be a blog.
The Space Of The Year Category
The most prestigious category of all. Sadly, this is reserved for the Director (namely me) to decide the winner. Points (see this Guide for more information on these) and previous wins and/or nominations do help though.
In this way, the categories are more open to all. Equality is something I value and this helps achieve that. Job accomplished.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 4月1日 Sharpen your lensesI am pleased to announce for the month of April, this month's BEACON category is Best Photo. So take a rummage around in your dusty archives and choose your best works for submissions! This month's category is open to all BEACON applicants!
Any and all photos are eligible from the wacky to plain boring! [Well, from your point of view anyway] Do keep the work original though. Penalties may apply to those who flout this rule.
Good luck all. The winner will receive the Happy Snapper Award for distinguised achievement in photography. Three submissions are allowed this month with a probable larger field of nominees to be expected. Send your photos to awakebetweendreams@hotmail.com or attach them if you can somehow.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards March's BEACON WinnerPoints have been updated accordingly with this announcement. See the "Earning Points" Guide under BEACON HQ for more information.
It's that time of the month where winners are announced! Thankyou again to all who were lucky enough to be nominated. It is agonising to have to pick between you all and in a field of six nominees, you can imagine the difficulty of picking out such a winner.
But choices have to be made and at the end of the day, there is a loser alas. But the winners enjoy the spoils!
On that note, let me proceed with declaring the winner of The Punch Line Award for Best Political, Satirical or Witty Blog the irrepressibly talented social-bunny for his witt, outrageous dilemma with the innocent multiple choice question.
Honourable mention goes out to Josh of Don't Panic for his brilliant analysis of the mechanics of internet bloggging. Here's hoping it gets published in a real book one day!
Here's your prize champ:
Already two months through the BEACON Awards! Look forward to reading your submissions bloggers! I wonder who will snatch the coveted prize for April?
Tomorrow the next category will be announced. Also, a FAQ style section is beginning that should set out the rules of BEACON down pat. Stay tuned.
See the BEACON shortlist for 2007
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 3月27日 Bringing home the BEACONThis points system references the three-tier category arrangement. Wondering what that is? Click here. With that in mind, proceed.
Honourable Mentions
Think of this as a "second place" prize. Higher tier categories earn more points than lower ones. Simple stuff:
Tier One Honourable Mentions earn you 3 points.
Tier Two Honourable Mentions earn you 5 points.
Tier Three Honourable mentions earn you 7 points.
Nominations
As expected, the tier system earns you greater points as you descend its rungs. This is shown below:
Tier One Nominations earn you 5 points.
Tier Two Nominations earn you 8 points.
Tier Three Nominations earn you 10 points.
Wins Earning points for wins follows on from the nomination. If you win, you thus earn points for the nomination and the win. This is demonstrated below:
Tier One Wins earn you 10 points.
Tier Two Wins earn you 12 points.
Tier Three Wins earn you 15 points.
The BEACON Board This is a cumulative total of points earned throughout the annual BEACON season. It will be updated routinely as nominations and winners are released.
What this means for BEACON
The points will have a large impact on the BEACON Space of the Year. Beyond that, it is merely for you BEACON followers to keep track of your progress.
This has been another update from your BEACON Director. Good day.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 3月23日 And Then There Were Five...New competition: Welcome is in order for Life in Pink Boots who joins the ranks of BEACON contenders. New applicants are always welcome. Spread the word.
A big thankyou is in order for all you jolly chaps that have been visiting oh-so-silently to my Space in the past few weeks. I have endeavoured to keep up with this Space with BEACON's objective in mind and have found it anything from pleasantly stimulating to downright hair-raising (I guarantee you that). Once again it is that time of the month where egos reign supreme. That's quickly becoming the hallmark of this cyberworld tussle.
As always, the possibilities are endless.
On a quick note, if you are providing submissions, please ensure you have linked correctly to your blogs. Try permalinking to the correct entry. It saves me time and ensures your entries are considered. Full stop. And if you were not lucky enough to be nominated this month, don't be disheartened, there's always next month! Winners will be announced at the month's end.
I found this month particularly difficult to judge but after deliberating over the wealth of entires, the five nominees for the Punch Line Award for Best Poltical, Satirical or Witty Blog are:
-The Blatant Expositor Director of the BEACON Awards 3月12日 One Woman's Mistake Is Another's Opportunity---BEACON news: Nominations expected next week. Keep the submissions coming! Winners announced at the end of the month---
Notes on a Scandal is Richard Eyre's dramatic thriller of a film, taking a keen hard look at teenage-to-teacher relationships and the dangers of lust, love and power. With an intriguing musical score, Phillip Glass heightens the gradual suspense of the piece while leaving observes guessing.
The film is presented through the narration of embittered history teacher Barbara Covett (Judi Dench), a predatory, calculating woman whose mere glance silences rooms at 100 paces. Acidic to the core, Dench's narration details the arrival of Sheba Hart (Cate Blanchett), a naive pottery teacher riddled by insecurity. Unbeknowst to Barbara, Sheba embarks on a sexually charged relationship with a fifteen year boy, Justin Colloney (Andrew Simpson) which creates tensions between the pair. With a hidden agenda in the midst, Barbara must connivingly weave a web of intrigue that will enable her to ensnare "the one she has waited for". Convincing Sheba to end the relationship for alterior motives, Barbara seizes upon the untimely desires of a desperate young woman in order to further her own standing, to unreasonable lengths. Barbara resolves to drive a wedge between Sheba and her husband (an acerbic Bill Nighy), with astonishing results.
Notes on a Scandal is a cautionary tale about inhibition, deceit and betrayal. While graphically depicting one of society's taboo subjects (the now not too uncommon practise of teacher-to-student relationships), Richard Eyre critically examines the lives of two women bound by the secrets they share. Although the start of the film is a touch slow, the musical score and the fleshed out characters ensure the plot only thickens as time goes by. And at 92 minutes, the film isn't too long at all. Perhaps my only criticism is the stereotypical representation of teachers and students in the film, though heavily crafted, it doesn't allow room for much sympathy. The subject matter is admittedly dark, and perhaps not the fare for a fun night out. But Notes on a Scandal is powerful and a film that won't leave you disappointed.
Blanchett is riveting in her role as a mother torn between the desires of her dysfunctional family and the demands of an authorative superior, while Dench chews up the scenery and spits it out at will. Both are highly deserving of their Oscar nods, though neither failed to carry out a win. Bill Nighy provides realism to his minimalist role and Simpson plays out the infamous "child" role convincingly enough. A dark humour permeates Notes, and Dench's witticisms only consolidate it further.
As director Eyre implies, secrets are ultimately all-consuming, self-destructive and monumentally dangerous things. Be careful what you hide. It may just come back to haunt you.
Notes on a Scandal: 4 stars
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 3月2日 Wit + Humour = WinnerAs the monthly race for the prestigious BEACON Awards continue, here are this month's shortlist applicants for March's category of Best Political, Witty or Satirical Blog:
Thie shortlist is considerably longer than last month's as this is a much more broader category. Here goes:
New applicants welcome. Submit your Space for a chance to participate. You should have all received a message from me confirming this. The expected BEACON timeline is on your top left of screen. Good luck folks. -The Blatant Expositor 3月1日 Winners...and Next MonthThank you for remaining with this seldomly dedicated blogger who is far less organised than he appears to be. From the five nominees, it was a very arduous process of choosing a winner. But winners are grinners, and well losers, they're still grinners!
Next month's category is Best Political, Satirical or Witty Blog. I can see some out there wringing their hands in expectation. I look forward to receiving your work in the future.
Congratulations are in order to DEREK of Live, Laugh, Learn and Most of All Love who takes out this month's award for Best Original Creative Piece for his brilliant blog entry "Empty Sheets". A terrific entry of love, loss and the pain of knowing things aren't as they should be.
And in the spirit of creative excellence, I've decided to use the awards as a set of motivational and empowering images that embody what BEACON is all about...celebrating cyber excellence in any way, shape or form.
Here is the Modern Protege Award:
A honourable mention goes out to Ben for his deviantArt Lord Asurman, Eldar Phoenix Lord that reminded me of the beauty of art (see previous blog entry)
My dearest thanks goes out to all nominees, who are all winners in my eyes.
Watch this Space.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 2月25日 Honour Roll---POST-OSCARS UPDATE---
Correct predictions (top 8 categories): 8/8 (100%)
Correct predictions (technical + minor categories): 8/16 (50%)
Overall correct predictions: 16/24 (75%)
***OSCAR WINNER
It's finally time! Oscars are just a wee bit away and as you do, this sometimes Awards-watcher decided to rise to the occassion. Short and sweet without the messy residue, here are my final predictions for 2007.
Best Picture: The Queen, The Departed***, Little Miss Sunshine, Letters from Iwo Jima, Babel
Who should win: The Departed
Who will win: The Departed
Difficult to call. Wide open. Any of the five could win.
Best Director: Martin Scorsese***, Clint Eastwood, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Stephen Frears, Paul Greengrass
Who should win: Eastwood or Greengrass
Who will win: Martin Scorsese
Scorsese + film = masterpiece. It's Scorsese's year. Any snub would be unthinkable. That's what my conscience says.
Best Actor: Forest Whitaker*** (The Last King of Scotland), Peter O'Toole (Venus), Leonardo Dicaprio (Blood Diamond), Will Smith (The Pursuit of Happyness), Ryan Gosling (Half Nelson)
Who should win: Ryan Gosling/Forest Whitaker
Who will win: Forest Whitaker
Signed, sealed and delivered. Enough said.
Best Actress: Meryl Streep (The Devil Wears Prada), Helen Mirren ***(The Queen), Kate Winslet (Little Children), Judi Dench (Notes on a Scandal) and Penelope Cruz (Volver)
Who should win: Helen Mirren
Who will win: Helen Mirren
As above. The Queen reigns.
Best Supporting Actor: Eddie Murphy (Dreamgirls), Jackie Earle Haley (Little Children), Mark Wahlberg (The Departed), Djimon Honsou (Blood Diamond), Alan Arkin*** (Little Miss Sunshine)
Who should win: Alan Arkin
Who will win: Alan Arkin
It's time for Arkin. Murphy will have to wait.
Best Supporting Actress: Jennifer Hudson*** (Dreamgirls), Rinko Kikuchi (Babel), Adriana Barraza (Babel), Abigail Breslin (Little Miss Sunshine), Cate Blanchett (Notes on a Scandal)
Who should win: Jennifer Hudson
Who will win: Jennifer Hudson
In the "it" year for J-Hud, she's going to be the overwhelming favourite. Only threat is Blanchett (a previous Oscar winner in this category) or Breslin (the "star" of the little movie that could)
Best Adapted Screenplay: The Departed***, Borat, Children of Men, Little Children, Notes on a Scandal
Who should win: The Departed
Who will win: The Departed
Weak year for adapted screenplays. No real competition for Scorsese's critical and commercial winner.
Best Original Screenplay: Little Miss Sunshine***, Babel, The Queen, Letters from Iwo Jima, Pan's Labyrinth
Who should win: The Queen
Who will win: Little Miss Sunshine
Tough. Three way battle between Babel, Sunshine and The Queen, with the latter two the frontrunners. Recent nod from the WGA suggest LMS is the one to pick.
Best Foreign Film: Pan's Labyrinth, Water, Days of Glory, After the Wedding, The Lives of Others***
Who should win: Pan's Labyrinth
Who will win: Pan's Labyrinth
Another semi-locked category. All the buzz is for Pan's.
Best Animated Feature: Cars, Happy Feet***, Monster House
Who should win: Cars
Who will win: Cars
Buzz failed to help Happy Feet, which has lost a number of times to Pixar's Cars.
And the rest...
Film Editing: The Departed
Art Direction: Dreamgirls [Pan's Labyrinth***]
Cinematography: Children of Men [Pan's Labyrinth***]
Costume Design: Marie Antoinette***
Make Up: Pan's Labyrinth***
Original Score: The Queen [Babel***]
Original Song: "Listen" from Dreamgirls ["I Need To Wake Up"*** from An Inconvenient Truth]
Sound Editing: Letters from Iwo Jima***
Sound Mixing: Dreamgirls***
Visual Effects: Pirates***
Animated Short: The Little Matchgirl
Live-Action Short: The Saviour [West Side Story ***]
Documentary Short: The Blood of Yingzhou District***
Documentary Feature: An Inconvenient Truth***
Fingers crossed.
-The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 2月24日 Creative ExposeIn the spotlight:
February 28: Winners announced
March 1: 2nd category announced
March 10: Nominations announced
March 31: Winners announced
In the trial period of BEACON, I've come to the conclusion that the awards process should revert back to the mainstream format. A little like this:
Category (1st day of month) > Shortlist (2nd wk) > Nominations (3rd wk) > Winners (Last wk)
Being on the shortlist does not equal a nomination. It is being used as criteria for a nomination. So there you go BEACONeers. Thought I should clear that up. Anywho, after reading your submissions (thank you to all who did), it is time to unveil the nominees for this month.
Congrats to all the nominees. Visit back at the end of the month to see who wins! -The Blatant Expositor
Director of the BEACON Awards 2月7日 Become your own PicassoIn the Spotlight:
February 7: Longlist released
February 8-20: Longlist submissions considered
February 21: Nominations announced
February 28: Winners announced
March 1: 2nd category announced
In the spirit of BEACON-giving, here are this month's proud longlist contenders for the category Best Original Creative Piece:
Good luck to all contenders. Submit your Space for BEACON Consideration BEACON Awards: Terms and Conditions See the BEACON shortlist for 2007 -The Blatant Expositor 2月1日 It continues...[edit] News: Domestica has been disqualified from BEACON for privitising her Space until further notice.
In the Spotlight:
February 7 - Longlist released
February 8-20 - Longlist submissions considered
February 21 - Nominations
February 28 - Monthly winners announced Category for this month is Best Original Creative Piece (Creative Writing, Poem, Artwork, Webcomic or Other).
Longlist submissions can include:
a) Artwork
b) Webcomics
c) Poem
d) Short story
e) Anything else I deem appropriate
All submissions must be original and posted in the period January 1-Decemember 31 2006. Longlist Spaces will be notified in the meantime. Watch this Space.
1月30日 And it begins...In the Spotlight:
February 1 - Category announcement
February 7 - Longlist
February 14 - Nominations
February 31 - Monthly winners announced
Now, I know all of you humble BEACON watchers have been waiting with (positively) baited breath over the last month or so awaiting the announcement of the BEACON shortlist. Now the BEACON Awards season begins!
A little friendly rivalry is always encouraged. So scheme, campaign and feel free to bribe! With no further ado, I present to you the glorious list of BEACON contenders:
Congrats to those who made the list. Watch this Space for pending announcements. In the meantime, this list (and any changes to its line-up can be located on my Space under the title "BlogSpotting". Submit your Space for BEACON Consideration -The Blatant Expositor 1月25日 Golden spoilsNominations for the 79th Academy awards are out - and according to Oscar Central's Mark Bakolar I predicted 35/40 of the 8 major categories! That's a top feat he reckons. Well, if he reckons so, then I'm chuffed. Positively. Details here:
'The only other person who I've seen do better was http://andyawakebetweendreams.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!E5E32166AF92A26B!1769.entry with 35 out of 40.'
What a surprise. Hopefully the luck won't piddle out come Oscar time.
-The Blatant Expositor 1月18日 The Road to Oscar GoldThe Golden Globes yesterday proved that an ultimately unsurprising fact: the so-called "glam" event of the year can be actually pretty uneventful. Not in the fashion stakes (they were probably as risque as ever) but in the awards race. Almost every category went as planned, with the predicted winner taking out kudos. The only surprises were probably Best Original Score which went to Alexander Desplat for his work in The Painted Veil, Best Original Song which instead of the predicted Dreamgirls (a musical no less), went to Happy Feet for "The Song of the Heart" performed by Prince and Best Motion Picture - Drama which went to Babel, which looked to be snubbed after it lost 5 out of 6 possible wins. Despite these latest events, the Globes will have little impact on the Oscar race, as ballots were already due in last weekend.
Here I detail what the Globes mean in terms of the upcoming Oscars, of which the nominations are due January 23. An oscar-wrap up will be due soon after nominations are released signalling my predictions for 2007. Watch this space.
My predicted nominees for the Oscars 2007 are as follows:
Best Picture
The Departed
Babel
The Queen
Dreamgirls/Little Miss Sunshine
Letters from Iwo Jima
Babel certainly gained momentum from the win last night, upsetting perenial favourite Martin Scorsese's police cop thriller The Departed. However, Dreamgirls defied the critics backlash and went on to to predictably win for Best Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy. Some prognosticators are now heralding Dreamgirls the frontrunner while affirming The Departed has lost stream and as for Babel, that train just keeps on chugging quietly away. The Queen, winner of the second highest amount of Globes (2 - one for Lead Actress - Drama and for Original Screenplay) firms as a quiet contender while Sunshine, though receiving no love from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, looks set to round out the Best Picture slate. A possible inclusion of Letters could be an surprising nod to Eastwood's Japanese-perspective war piece, taking out the Best Foreign Language film as predicted. All other films (i.e. Children of Men, Pan's Labyrinth, United 93) have been released too late or are being ignored by the major critics and awards groups. That's pretty your Oscar Best Picture 5 or 6, give or take one.
Best Actor in a Leading Role
Leonardo Dicaprio for The Departed
Peter O'Toole for Venus
Ryan Gosling for Half Nelson
Will Smith for The Pursuit of Happyness
Forest Whitaker for The Last King of Scotland
Possible chance: In a populist world, Sacha Baron Cohen for Borat
Whitaker has cemented his dominance in the pre-cursor awrads by taking out the Globe for Best Actor - Drama, shutting out possible winners Dicaprio and O'Toole. With the category pretty much decided, Whitaker better prepare a better speech come Oscar night. Some say his dribble during the Globes warrants another winner. You be the judge.
Best Actress in a Leading Role
Penelope Cruz for Volver
Judi Dench for Notes on a Scandal
Helen Mirren for The Queen
Meryl Streep for The Devil Wears Prada
Kate Winslet for Little Children
Again, another dead-lock category. The awards race has centred around "The Five" Oscar women you see above, with Mirren taking absolutely everything there is. As Mirren's persona Elizabeth II "already has a globe that adorns her sceptre" Mirren found it fitting to take the coveted prize. Come Oscar night, she will be Queen. Sadly, competition from the likable Streep and Dench isn't likely to sway voters.
Best Director
Martin Scorsese for The Departed
Bill Condon for Dreamgirls
Stephen Frears for The Queen
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu for Babel
Clint Eastwood for Letters from Iwo Jima
Outside chance: Paul Greengrass for United 93
First four are practically locks. I can't see anyone else really entering the spots these four occupy. And as for Eastwood, he is the most likely fifth candidate. The Dayton-Valeris team who brought you Little Miss Sunshine are unlikely to make the cut, due to their status as a duo directing team. That leaves Academy favourite Eastwood with a good shot at the last slot.
Best Supporting Actor
Jackie Earle Haley for Little Children
Eddie Murphy for Dreamgirls
Djimon Honsou for Blood Diamond
Alan Arkin for Little Miss Sunshine
Mark Wahlberg for The Departed
Outside chance: Michael Sheen for The Queen or Brad Pitt for Babel
Toughest category to call. With the other three acting categories virtually locked up nicely, the supporting actor category looks like the only chance of an upset. Critics favour Haley while the Globes awarded Murphy. Its the story of the comeback actor: Haley and Murphy. Honsou will score a deserved nomination and Arkin too. But vote splitting will see one of The Departed men miss out.
Best Supporting Actress
Jennifer Hudson for Dreamgirls
Cate Blanchett for Notes on a Scandal
Rinko Kikuchi for Babel
Adriana Barraza for Babel
Abigail Breslin for Little Miss Sunshine
Outside chance: Catherine O'Hara for For Your Consideration
Another locked category. Miss Ex-Idol seems primed for the win. Babel women will split votes, with most likely Barraza missing out if there's an omission. Blanchett will receive a nod, if only for her impressive performance alongside weathered Dame Judi Dench. Abigail has the Sunshine factor and should ride the wave to her first nomination.
Best Original Screenplay
Michael Arndt for Little Miss Sunshine
Peter Morgan for The Queen
Guillermo Arriaga for Babel
Paul Greengrass for United 93
Zach Helm for Stranger than Fiction
Possible chance: Letters from Iwo Jima
The Queen, Little Miss and Babel are locks. United 93 has critical support and Stranger than Fiction has a WGA nod. Simple stuff. Possible inclusion of Letters from Iwo Jima.
Best Adapted Screenplay
William Monahan for The Departed
Bill Condon for Dreamgirls
Todd Field for Little Children
Patrick Marber for Notes on a Scandal
Alfonso Cuaron for Children of Men
Possible chance: Sacha Baron Cohen for Borat, Aline Brosh McKenna for The Devil Wears Prada or Neil Burger for The Illusionist.
The Departed is a raging hot favourite for a nod, with a Scripter Award win. Children of Men, Devil and Notes are all nominees and will figure strongly. Expect a challenge from Thank You for Smoking and The Illusionist.
Best Animated Feature Film
Cars
Happy Feet
Monster House
Outside chance: Flushed Away
Down to pretty much Pixars's Cars and Happy Feet but Monster House and Over the Hedge will compete for the final nomination.
Best Foreign Language Film
Volver
Pan's Labyrinth
The Lives of Others
Water
Days of Glory
With the omission of Letters from Iwo Jima and Apocalypto due to the Oscars' policies regarding foreign language films, the race is suddenly all about Pan's, Volver and The Lives of Others. Rest are not commercial enough or category.
AND THE REST...
Cinematography: Children of Men, Babel, Dreamgirls, Apocalypto, The Black Dahia
Possible chance: The Good Shepherd/The Illusionist
Tough category. Hard to tell if Dreamgirls has a definite shot. Children of Men is a lock and Babel almost as well. Apocalypto and Dahlia look set to sneak in.
Art Direction: Pan's Labyrinth, Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest, Dreamgirls, Marie Antoinette, The Illusionist
Outside shot: Letters from Iwo Jima/Flags of Our Fathers or Curse of the Golden Flower
Film Editing: The Departed, Childen of Men, Babel, United 93, Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest
Outside shot: Casino Royale
Visual Effects: Superman Returns, Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest, Poseidon
Outside chance: Eragon/Night at the Museum
Costume Design: Dreamgirls, Marie Antoinette, Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest, The Devil Wears Prada and Curse of the Golden Flower
Possible entrant: Pan's Labyrinth/The Illusionist
Make Up: Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest, Apocalypto, Pan's Labyrinth
Outside shot: The Prestige
Sound Mixing: Dreamgirls, The Departed, Apocalypto, Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest and Blood Diamond
Possible nominees: Happy Feet, Pirates, Flags and The Da Vinci Code
Sound Editing: Blood Diamond, Flags of our Fathers, Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest, Casino Royale and Letters from Iwo Jima
Outside shot: Cars, World Trade Centre and Happy Feet
Original Song: Dreamgirls, Cars, Happy Feet, An Inconvenient Truth, Dreamgirls II
Possible nominees: Charlotte's Web and Dreamgirls (yes again)
Documentary Feature: An Inconvenient Truth, Iraq in Fragments, Jesus Camp, Deliver Us From Evil, Jonestown: The Life and Death of the People's Temple
Original Score: Alexandre Desplat for The Queen, Thomas Newman for The Good German, Gustavo Santaolalla for Babel, Hans Zimmer for The Da Vinci Code and Phillip Glass for Notes on a Scandal
Original Song: Dreamgirls, Happy Feet, An Inconvenient Truth, Bobby and Shut Up and Sing
Possible nominees: Cars and Charlotte's Web
Documentary Feature: An Inconvenient Truth, Iraq in Fragments, Jesus Camp, Deliver Us from Evil and Jonestown: The Life and Death of the People's Temple
"Know it and it will be so" - Maximus, from the film Gladiator
-The Blatant Expositor 1月16日 Glorify the painLife is devilishly objective. Despite some of us harbouring inner demons too terrifying to mention, the world trudges on, irrespective of our burdens. What we like to think makes it better is all the "good" in the world, the light at the end of the tunnel so to speak, the salvation that awaits a martyr's death - the glory that befalls a soldier's quest.
The sad thing is a soldier, however noble can die a lonely death. And his memory will be lost, dispersed through space on the sands of time. Let this soldier share with you a sorrowful tale of hopes unfulfilled, wishes ignored and a life that could have been.
All my uneventful life I've been in the grip of one obsession after another. It began in simple, mundane facets of my existence - the last cookie from the "forbidden" jar, the flashy, gimmick-charged toys I demanded relentlessly, the special someone I longed to smile upon my offers of friendship. And now, at the surprisingly ripe old age of sixteen this weary teenager sees what he has become.
A knight trained in the art of pretence and false expectations. A studious disciple of self-control and an understudy to sacrifice.
Perfection is the obsession that occupies my attentions now. It graces my periphery, drawing me in so connivingly at times, it seems obtainable, though I know the illusion is fleeting. I am aware imperfeciton makes the man what he is and yet, I wonder would it be so tragic, for a human, just for one second to be all and know all there is? For a single individual to elevate to the limits of the human frame in a single, perfect moment? Tantalising indeed, but now I know it is not for me.
The desire for perfection is gone, but the obsession still persists.
As obsession continues, so does the allure of rewards to compensante our fixation...and our suffering. For those who wander aimlessly in the realms of Obsession suffer undeniably so in a pain that words can't properly explain. Pain belongs in the mind and words cannot come even close to doing it justice.
So why do we open our streams of consciousness and let others into our world, to communicate our disastification, our love, our hopes and our tragedies if as said before, pain is insurmountable? Why is it our loved ones can coax out our hurt though we feel at times, the whole world would just turn on without us?
We feel in our naive way, that they can understand and sympathise with, the grief we think they can heal. That they know what to do to make it all go away, to banish it from the corridors of our mind. But the truth is, pain and grief are always with us and do not depart for the sake of some attached companion or unfortunate sidekick. Time knows no boundaries and the pain simply stretches on, whole and unforgiving.
Embrace pain; for though it can be a troubling reminder of times not so promising times, it is a powerful tool that when used properly, can define the person you are to be.
Are you the one who shies away from pain, cowering away from its reach or do you reach forward and take pain head on? Your choice.
-The Blatant Expositor 1月12日 A golden kind of spotlight [EDITED]POST-GOLDEN GLOBES RESULTS:
* = winner
Correct Predictions
Movies: 10/14 (71%)
TV: 6/11 (55%)
Overall: 16/25 (64%)
Word from me: Ouch. Movies wasn't that bad. TV..er well too few categories. Overall okay for a first-timer. Hope to do better at the Oscars.
BEACON AWARDS REMINDER: SUBMISSIONS FOR THE BEACON AWARDS 2007 CLOSE JANUARY 24. SUBMIT YOUR SPACE FOR A CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE!
COMING UP:
JANUARY 31 - SHORTLISTED SPACES ANNOUNCED
FEBRUARY 1 - FIRST CATEGORY ANNOUNCED
FEBRUARY 7 - LONGLIST ANNOUNCED
FEBRUARY 14 - NOMINATIONS RELEASED
FEBRUARY 31 - WINNERS ANNOUNCED
Meanwhile, enjoy this Awards coverage courtesy of yours truly:
With the awards season well and truly upon us, I decided to jump upon the bandwagon and pitch in. Bear in mind that I have little assurance in my own credibility other than my own subjectivness. Take these with a grain of salt. My Golden Globe Predictions for 2007 are:
EDIT: Changed predictions are as follows:
MOVIES
Best Foreign Language Film - Letters from Iwo Jima
Best Original Score - Gustavo Santaolalla for "Babel"
TV
Best Actress in a TV Series - Drama: Patricia Arquette
Best TV Series - Comedy/Musical: Ugly Betty
Best Mini-Series or Motion Picture Made For Television: Elizabeth I
Best Actress in a Mini-Series or Motion Picture Made For Television: Helen Mirren - Elizabeth I
Coppers triumph: With no clear frontrunner for this year, this race is far from set in stone. Bobby doesn't stand a chance, despite a high-profile ensemble and Little Children has been lost in the awards rush added to the fact of having no particularly likeable characters. Babel, though surging in recent weeks has been criticised for its over-arching and confusing storylines and long running time. And The Queen, while the most consistent in terms of acting is the quiet achiever. The Departed firms as the likely favourite, fuelled by long-time Oscar loser Martin Scorsese. Don't count out: The Queen. Public sentiment and Helen Mirren's blistering performance could help it over the line. And the winner is: The Departed 2. BEST ACTOR - DRAMA LEONARDO DICAPRIO PETER O'TOOLE WILL SMITH *FOREST WHITAKER - BLOOD DIAMOND + THE DEPARTED -VENUS -THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS -THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND
You better not run Forest, you'll miss out: Despite Dicaprio's double nomination, most likely Leo will suffer vote siphoning. Will Smith does impress as an impoverished man struggling to provide for his son but the nomination is as good as he can hope for. Peter O'Toole received the Honourary Oscar recently, harming his chances of claiming Oscar gold. Forest Whitaker has amazed, winning almost every precursor award in the lead in to the Oscars. Don't count out: Peter O'Toole. An Academy favourite may win enough votes to snare the top prize. Stranger things have happened. And the winner is: Forest Whitaker for nailing a difficult role. 3. BEST ACTRESS - DRAMA PENELOPE CRUZ JUDI DENCH MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL *HELEN MIRREN KATE WINSLET - VOLVER -NOTES ON A SCANDAL -SHERRYBABY -THE QUEEN -LITTLE CHILDREN God Dame, it's Helen: Penelope Cruz has played against type, returning to the Spanish films she owns. Judi Dench shows a dark side portraying a conniving teacher, while Maggie Gyllenhaal wows in Sherrybaby. Helen Mirren showcases remarkable strength of character in her take on the popular British monarch while Kate Winslet delights in the deeply moving Little Children. Penelope Cruz may suffer being overlooked due to her film's foreign ties and Maggie Gyllenhaal's film is relatively unnoticed while Kate Winslet, a four time nominee will sadly miss out again. Don't count out: Judi Dench. A fello Dame, Dame's dark performance may steal her rival's thunder. And the winner is: Helen Mirren for showing the others how its done. A mix of humour, satire and stoic resoluteness will most likely win over the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. 4. BEST MOTION PICTURE - COMEDY/MUSICAL BORAT THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA *DREAMGIRLS LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE THANK YOU FOR SMOKING Live the dream: Borat divided opinion and critics, especially regarding Sascha Baron Cohen's performance in a grossly offensive film. Collecting some buzz, it seems Borat is a one-man show and will most likely not win the prize. The Devil Wears Prada too is more popcorn flick than anything and Thank You For Smoking is simply too obscure and is overshadowed by its competition. Dreamgirls is reminiscent of another Academy-Award winner Chicago, suffering critical backlash for overhype. Little Miss Sunshine quietly sneaks in, with a recent nod at the DGAs (Director Guild Awards) showing that directors take it as a serious Oscar candidate for Best Picture. Don't count out: Little Miss Sunshine. Blessed with a stellar ensemble cast, this is one of the most delightfully hilarious and upbeat films of the year. And the winner is: Dreamgirls for nailing the marketing side and turning in an exemplary piece. 5. BEST ACTOR - COMEDY/MUSICAL -BORAT... -PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN 2 -THANK YOU FOR SMOKING -KINKY BOOTS -STRANGER THAN FICTION
Glorious Kazakhstan: Sacha Baron Cohen in the laugh-out loud performance of the year rocked the socks of most of us, who took little heed that he managed to offend almost every minority group possible. Critics have warmed to him in recent months, which strengthens his position. Two-time Globe nominee Depp looks set to miss out for his portrayal of the quirky pirate Jack Sparrow. Not enough meat in the role I think personally while Ejiofors's film is hardly setting the roof on fire, with a little known cast and low box office takings. Eckhart and Ferrell deliver standard performances with moderate versatility in two of the most underrated films of the year. Don't count out: Aaron Eckhart with Johnny Depp not far behind. Either could snatch an unexpected win. 6. BEST ACTRESS - COMEDY/MUSICAL ANNETE BENING TONI COLLETTE BEYONCE KNOWLES *MERYL STREEP RENEE ZELLWEGER -RUNNING WITH SCISSORS -LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE -DREAMGIRLS -THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA -MISS POTTER
Devilishly fashionable: Bening shines in Running with Scissors, a sorely underrated film as does Streep vying for another Globe. Streep takes on a devilish persona as a ruthless fashion editor, dominating the film and chewing up the scenery. Collette sparkles in another underrated performance, though ignored by critics, will the HFPA recognise her? I don't think so. And though Dreamgirls is a frontrunner in the BP race, Beyonce isn't. Hard to see why she garnered a nomination (perhaps a weak field?) as with Zellweger. Beyonce is easily outdone by Hudson and Murphy while Zellweger's irritating mannerisms allow McGregor to stand out. Don't count out: Bening followed by Collette. Underrated performances can surprise you and both are deserving, if Bening a touch more. And the winner is: Streep for proving fashion can be mixed with diva. 7. BEST ANIMATED FILM
*CARS HAPPY FEET MONSTER HOUSE
March of the penguins: Consider Monster House shut out. Cars and Happy Feet are heavyweight giants with commercial backing and critical support. Cars is the final compilation piece from Pixar and Disney and bears all the trademarks of their unique partnership. Happy Feet is director George Miller’s animated gloss featuring an all-star ensemble and with the added bonus of a beneficial release date, is sure to weigh in heavily come awards time.
Don’t count out: Cars. With some backlash for Happy Feet’s not-so-subtle messages, Cars could sweep the pool through good-clean revhead action. And the winner is: Following in the wake of Oscar-winning doco March of the Penguins, Happy feet is toe-tapping fun which manages to lend a critical eye to global warming. Penguins rule again. 8. BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM APOCALYPTO *LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA THE LIVES OF OTHERS PAN'S LABYRINTH VOLVER Fantasy comeback: Apocalypto has been received surprisingly well, given Gibson's recent anti-Jew outburst. Crtics have warmed to the film, though critiquing it for its displays of overly graphic violence. And Eastwood's epic Letters is far more successful than his failed box office flop Flags of Our Fathers, its companion piece. However, its rushed release to qualify for the 2007 Awards race has seen it miss critics support in the pre-cursor awards. And while Lives of Others started out strongly, its floundering. Volver, though critically well received from director Pedro Almodavar, is being overshadowed by its grand competitors and seems to be a platform for display Cruz's acting breakout. Pan's Labyrinth is a critical success, marking Del Toro's ascension to the realm of spectacular film making. Blending cinematography with tension, horror and fantasy is no easy ask. Luckily, Del Toro pulls it off famously. Don't count out: Letters followed by Apocalypto. Love for these two Academy-Award winning directors could tip the boat. Pan's suffers from a lack of a celebrated director and in one of the most hotly contested categories in Globe history, this race is anything but assured. And the winner is: Pan's Labyrinth for showing how to turn a child's tale into a surprinsly dark and horrific movie masterpiece. 9. BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS ADRIANA BARRAZA CATE BLANCHETT EMILY BLUNT *JENNIFER HUDSON RINKO KIKUCHI - BABEL -NOTES ON A SCANDAL -THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA -DREAMGIRLS -BABEL Dream and you can do anything: This year has been a stellar year for supporting performances, particularly for women. With the arrival of Hudson, filmmakers have a new talent on their hands. Bursting with innovation, energy and exuberance, Hudson holds her own and owns the film Dreamgirls, making Beyonce Knowles, Jamie Foxx and Eddie Murphy pale into comparison. Her musical numbers are exhilirating and her acting is almost perfect., It's hard to imagine her supposedly zero acting experience. The "Babel duo" of Barraza and Kikuchi have been a revelation, achoring the film's chaotic storylines and pulling in great performances. Though Barraza's is underated, she is outdone by Kikuchi who delivers a moving performance in her portrayal of a mute Japanese teenager. Blunt occupies the scenery in Devil Wears Prada but is easily beaten by Streep, who shows her how its done. Blanchett turns in a gritty and emotional turn as a desperate schoolteacher pining for love but her role isn't exactly Academy-friendly. Don't count out: Kikuchi followed by Blanchett. In a tough year, Kikuchi and Blanchett have both delivered deserving performances. Each snagging their own swag of precursor awards shouldn't hurt. Though vote siphoning for Kikuchi could harm her chances at a win. Blanchett, a former winner in this category at the Oscars, has star power behind her plus a terrific co-star in Dench. However, Dench shines in the film which Blanchett tags along. Hudson has borne the brunt of backlash for her performance, with some saying her role isn't versatile and others criticising her "wooden" acting. Despite these setbacks, this may be the year of the Dreamette. And the winner is: Hudson for proving to the world she can actually sing. AND act too and well. 10. BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR BEN AFFLECK *EDDIE MURPHY JACK NICHOLSON BRAD PITT MARK WAHLBERG -HOLLYWOODLAND -DREAMGIRLS -THE DEPARTED -BABEL -THE DEPARTED The man behind the dream: Murphy surprised all by finally turning in an Awards-worthy performance, as did Affleck. Though Affleck's isn't in the same calbire as Murphy's, it is good to see some unfamiliar faces this time around. Nicholson has been criticised for his zany, wacky performance while others believe he is simply "being Jack" and does not deserve the win this time. Fellow co-star Wahlberg has proved his versatility recently and made the most out of a small but showy role and Pitt submits his best work since Twelve Monkeys. Don't count out: Mark Wahlberg. This overlooked role is definitely a contender. Deserves the recognition; a outside shot at grabbing the gold. The HFPA has done a shocking job with the nominees, preferring to go with big name stars and ignoring the deserving nominees. Arkin, Honsou, Sheen are all more deserving than Pitt and Affleck, who merely stumble into the category due to the HFPA's love of star wattage. Unfortunately for them, the light won't shine for them. And the winner is: Eddie Murphy for playing against type and silencing the critics once and for all. Murphy has been the only one to earn nods at every single major precursor award, showing the general consistent perspective on his performance. The rest is open season. In the most open fields of this year, the award could go to anyone. 11. BEST DIRECTOR CLINT EASTWOOD STEPHEN FREARS ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ INARRITU *MARTIN SCORSESE -FLAGS OF OUR FATHERS + LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA -THE QUEEN -BABEL -THE DEPARTED
Marty's reward: Clint has pulled off a showstopper, delivering really one story from different points of view. It was a gamble and it kind of paid off. Flags bombed but Letters soared, a mixed bag to be sure. Frears work The Queen has been applauded by many for its performance of Helen Mirren, the lock for the Best Actress race this year. Despite the rave reviews, they are more for Mirren than for Frears, which should see Frears lose out. An art-house film hasn't hurt in Oscar history though and you never say never when it comes to the Academy Awards. Gonzalez Inarritu produced a complex film regarding our ability to listen to those around us and the sentiment was touching but critics have responsed with variable reviews and box-office takings have been low as mentioned before. Babel's colluded storylines don't help its chances either and its long running time. That leaves Scorsese, as a long time loser in the Best Director race as the deserving winner. Public outrage at his loss may just get him over the line. People don't want to see another Hitchcock. Don't count out: An Eastwood-Frears upset. the Academy may be cruel and avoid the pointedly obvious, which has happened before. Don't rule out another loss for Scorsese. Many have called it not his best work and not perfect but then again, it isn't perfect as no film can truly be. And the winner is: Scorsese for delivering a film that shocks you into breathlessness. For getting the most of his outstanding ensemble cast and striking the knockout blow like everyone expected. And the rest... BEST SCREENPLAY: PETER MORGAN - *THE QUEEN BEST ORIGINAL SCORE: CLINT MANSELL - THE FOUNTAIN *ALEXANDER DESPLAT - THE PAINTED VEIL ******************************************************************************************************************* GOLDEN GLOBES - TELEVISION AWARDS BEST TELEVISION SERIES - DRAMA: *GREY'S ANATOMY BEST ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES - DRAMA: KYRA SEDGWICK [THE CLOSER] (SEE ABOVE)BEST ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES - DRAMA: *HUGH LAURIE [HOUSE] BEST TELEVISION SERIES - COMEDY/MUSICAL: DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES *UGLY BETTY BEST ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES - COMEDY/MUSICAL: FELICITY HUFFMAN [DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES] *AMERICA FERRARA BEST ACTOR IN A TELEVISION SERIES - COMEDY/MUSICAL: TONY SHALHOUB [MONK] *ALEC BALDWIN: 30 ROCK BEST MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION: PRIME SUSPECT: THE FINAL ACT (SEE ABOVE) BEST ACTRESS IN A MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION: HELEN MIRREN [PRIME SUSPECT: THE FINAL ACT] (SEE ABOVE) BEST ACTOR IN A MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION: ROBERT DUVALL [BROKEN TRAIL] *BILL NIGHY - GIDEON'S DAUGHTER BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS IN A SERIES, MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION: KATHERINE HEIGL [GREY'S ANATOMY] *EMILY BLUNT - GIDEON'S DAUGHTER BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR IN A SERIES, MINI-SERIES OR MOTION PICTURE MADE FOR TELEVISION: *JEREMY IRONS [ELIZABETH I] 1月5日 Monster's BallNote: Terms and Conditions for the BEACON Awards updated. Apparently there is still some confusion amongst my readers. Please read it carefully. An idyllic world exists today in the minds of all those who partake in it. How many of us wish that the world was completely safe, rid of all the "evils" that plague us so irrevocably? Though we are constantly bombarded with media affirming this cannot ever be (ie. terrorism, civil unrest, etc) it is still comforting to pretend and delight, in the seductively deceptive concepts our minds conceive - that one day we can live without looking over our shoulder. Alas, the world is really not that much different to how it was one hundred years ago. And yet, there is a much greater threat we do not heed, though even as we speak someone out there is discovering theirs. The true monsters of our world - the irrepressible inner self. I'm not talking about the plesantly bubbly, vivacious selves we present to the world, I mean the selves we unleash and reveal only when burdened with the most formidable of weights, the pressures of the world we so ardently hope to straddle amongst the chaotic confusion of our existence. The byproducts of anger, bewilderment, madness - those are the truest of terrors. The ones we should really be afraid of. It is terrifying to confront the facts, more so when one knows that the truth in question is truer than they know, something they've never acknowledged but never had to before, as truths, whether acknowledged or denied, confer their effects regardless. The true confrontation we undergo operates in the mental arena, through the conflict of wills we arm ourselves with, assuring ourselves we are not like the rest. That we are good and honest folk. That we would never tell a lie. Or yell at those we love. These are the things that maketh the man. For what can one truly hope to learn if this self-discovery does not occur? The seasoned man, the one that acknowledges his sins and inner demons, is one step closer to redemption to the man that hides, scared of what he doesn't understand. The reality is none of us are angels. Perhaps some of us are demons. The conundrum here is what we call those in the middle. Simply ordinary. And ultimately human. It is no shame to yell, or scream or lust. These are are our human attributes, endowned on us by God knows who. No matter where they came from, humans have continually affirmed themselves throughout the years from their mistakes and misdemenours as flawed creatures and perhaps in all honesty, all the better for it. Naturally, we are all inclined to believe we are "good people", much different from the wrongdoers who perpetuate our streets and our corridors, seemingly no different from you or I. And yet, when we are enraged or confused, sometimes we are no better than they are. Each of us has an inner monster that is but waiting to come out. It's only a matter of time. This creature you may think, is inherently "bad" or evil. But thats the thing. If one debates on it long enough, one may question why we have good and evil. Or really if they exist at all. Perhaps those of us who can relate to this simply believe good and evil are subjective matters, blurred by bias and perspective. This concept is most refreshing when applied to people of varying merits. One may value his brother a legend, his father a god and his brother-in-law a saint. Though I ask, are none of these men immune to violence, betrayal or skepticism? At the end of the day, isn't each man, no matter how honourable his purpose or objective in life, a sinner, and thus doomed to sin again and again? Certainly. And that's the double-edged sword of our lives. Therefore, each of us must possess a certain amount of good and evil within us. The only difference between us and those who pay for their sins (eg. criminals), is how we express these unquantifiable attributes. Learn. And embrace both sides of you. For there has never been a hero, or champion so great who has never relished or been consumed with, the knowledge that our true self defines us in ways in which we don't intend. Happy New Year everyone. -The Blatant Expositor. ![]() 12月23日 BEACON Awards: Terms and ConditionsIf you have not submitted your Space for consideration yet, your perusal of this document is not necessary. Do so, then return. The submisision blog can be found either here. Let's proceed. One would hope this guide will accomplish its objective and clear any misconception you may have regarding these Awards and how they operate. Any queries can be directed to the comments section below. Enjoy.
OBJECTIVE To recognise and acknowledge both existing and new examples of cyberspace excellence that provide value to the blogging community from an intellectual, humurous or otherwise significant sense.
STARTER POINTS
SPACE SUBMISSIONS To give your Space the chance for inclusion in the BEACON Awards, you must submit it by the specified date, that being January 24 2007. Late Spaces will be considered by posting at the appropriate blog found here. The criteria would acceptance into the Spaces shortlist are:
Once submitted, your Space will be eligible for every category for the year. There is NO NEED to submit yourself again for the same year. If your submission is successful, you will receive a message from me. Longlist Each category (except for the Most Popular Space, Most Underrated Space, Best Commentator or Best Space of the Year) will be subject to a longlist of some 6-10 nominees. Each longlist member will be asked to submit an example of their Space (ie. a blog, photo, etc) that they think provides them the best chance of winning the category. From this, the list of nominations will be generated. SHORTLIST Once I have considered the number of Spaces, I compile a shortlist listing those Spaces I believe embody the objective of the BEACON Awards. The shortlist is where the nominees will come from for the 10 categories throughout the year. NOMINATIONS Five nominees are the norm for each category however six may be permitted. Nominations for the same Space are permitted, but difficult to obtain. Nominations are announced at the middle of each month. AWARDS Award winners will be announced at the end of each month. Awards can be withheld or handed to another recipient at the discretion of the Director, namely myself. CATEGORIES Categories have been chosen based on mainstream values and accessibility. If you feel a category should be changed or included, do not hesitate to voice your opinion anywhere on the Space as you see fit. Feedback would be warmly appreciated. Categories are chosen in random order, meaning there is no way to coordinate your Space in line with the Awards. All objects considered for each category must be posted up to and before the date nominations are released within the previous year. Therefore to be eligible for BEACON consideration, all articles of all Spaces must have been posted up to and before (and no later) than the 1st January 2006. The categories are listed below. In no particular order, the categories are as follows:
IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONSIDER
The Blatant Expositor Director of the BEACON© Awards BEACON ConsiderationHello bloggers, As you may or may not know, I've decided to undertake a small venture with this Space, the introduce of the BEACON Awards, designed to place the spotlight (no pun intended) on Spaces of deserved excellence. BEACON stands as a curious acronym for The Blatant Expositor Award for Cyberspace Objects of Notable Success. The mechanics of the system will be explained at a later date. Until then, use this blog entry to submit your Space for consideration. It can also be found in the "Important" section of my Space. Enjoy and good luck. Please provide me some feedback on your thoughts, queries or concerns regarding the system. -The Blatant Expositor Director of the BEACON Awards 11月24日 Promise makes the world go roundEach of us seeks our own form of excitement, some source of innovation that imbues our life with meaning and ultimately purpose. We endeavour to instill our lives with change and fulfillment so as to appease our distaste, unease and inaction. Though in some forms blatant and others more subtle, every human (male or female) desires to seek and capture the special something that makes the world that little bit brighter.
Humans are strange creatures indeed. Blessed with the ability to travel, learn and desire is almost a curse in itself. You see, this makes us rather one-sided. Once humans are endowed with the potential to expand into new sectors, the possibilities are practically limitless.
Therein lies our flaw.
We cannot remain content with the objective reality - we are ever searching for the little bit extra to provide our lives with accomplishment - the feeling that we have made a perceivable difference to the world. We are drawn by the trappings of isolation and futility and persuaded to forsake our inhibitions in order to aspire to greater heights. We cannot simply enjoy the fruits of our labours and be content with the demise of today and the potential in tomorrow. Our human inclinations propel us towards difference and curiousity in momentary episodes designed to maximise our limited time on this Earth.
We are littered with innumerable possiblities that promise to make our lives simplier, more exciting, appealing or fashionable. We are relentlessly bombarded with propaganda attempting to hold our attentions in a bid to market the latest fad. Propaganda rarely shifts its focus, medium or purpose and for that it could be said, the modern day human is rather well-equipped to deal with the myriad of advertising that permeates numerous aspects of our existence. Despite this fact, humans succumb like moths to a flame at the advent of something novel and corporation moguls irrevocably find their way to our wallets. Consider for a moment that the "evolving" society may be becoming dehumanised in ways in which we do not like enough to acknowledge. For who can say in this world of dog-eat-dog commercialism, that we are any better off than the ancestors who proceeded us? In truth, it is likely the human race is heading towards mass uniformity, as smaller businesses are suppressed by the influential hold of fast-paced companies. Fixiated on the products they pledge to manufacture, we lose sight of the simple pleasures in life that are in the end vastly more gratifying.
Contrary to popular belief, this addiction to routine excitement can be beneificial. The guarantee of stimulation or even the hint of adventure is enough to coax out our impulsive nature long enough for our bodies to formulate methods of obtaining it. Due to promise, we are changed sometimes for the better. The end result drives us to succeed, to achieve our goals selflessly for the good of ourselves and our significant others. This remarkable foresight derived from the will to be successful, is certainly one of the most potent capabilities of man. No doubt we still remain oblivious to how often we take advantage of it.
Ironically, all our fleeting excitements tend to do is to sustain our flames of desire long enough to seek out the next avenue of exhilaration before the blaze smoulders. Thus the cyclical model of the human nature persistently turns, probing for the item that will end our cravings once and for all.
Us human subjects are all vulnerable to the attraction of ingenuity. Technological masterminds produce, consumer figures distribute and the advertising heads weave their magic in the landscape of our minds. The producer, seller and consumer are all contented with no single party faring worse off. From the satirical viewpoint, it is a perfect world; but one in which we are naive to think is fair or equal.
So very long ago, humans were content in the promise of family and good times; how times have changed. Fuelled with the embers of commercialism that so cleverly manipulates the human nature, the desire to be content is largely subservient to the expectations of the society. In this brave new world of promise, the allure engagement offers inevitably overides our rationale and drives us to extreme lengths to satisfy our yearnings.
Isn't our world adept at that? For what hope is there for the future of our race if corporations have continually pushed the same buttons for years without faill? The past image of the family model content in the modest gifts of subsistence is now a dull fantasy. All we are left with is the unquenchable thirst for more.
-The Blatant Expositor 9月25日 What lies beneathI stood longingly in front of the mirror, gazing longingly over the flawless surface. My eyes skimmed the radiant exterior and considered if it were possible. Seeing the Nike sticker emblazoned with the words “Reversible” abruptly confirmed my fears. It is possible, my mind alluded. Noting my eager anticipation, it went on What have you got to lose? At this moment I thought, Not a darn thing. The pretence was complete. Breakage was not an issue unless I made it one. We all love our facades - images of realities we assemble to shroud the inner intricacies of our character in falsehood and lies. We delight in the ease at which we don them and the remarkable impact they confer on those willing enough to accept them. The needy and desperate use facades in order to comply with the social guidelines associated with cohesion: acceptance and popularity are viewed as the higher gods to the subordinate deception and manipulation that pretence entails. That's all pretence is - a manipulation of the truths into concepts more appealing to our nature. The way we fashion the truth is subject to our own approval; ironically the truth is subservient to our own perception or appropriateness. The truth is swiftly eroded into the realm of nothingness until it cannot be told from fiction where fiction becomes reality in frightening realism. We indulge our inner inhibitions by producing these internal modifications. We seek to bring about change in some way or another: whether it is to alter the opinions of the "superior" faction, to improve one's standing amongst those of equal or lesser rank or to elevate oneself above others in spite of the reality in front of us. Truth is consequently forgotten on our quest to pristine perfection and presentation. A fitting example to this is the environment in the dystopian world illustrated in George Orwell's "1984" whereby the inhabitants were able to deny and repress their individuality through continual reinforcement of self-hypnosis. Doublethink it was called and aptly too: the ability to possess at once two contradictory thoughts and simultaenously believing both of them. Regardless of the consequences, the individuals endured endless years of the subversion of truth and the denial of objective reality in their one-sided loyalty to a totalitarian leader, spawned from the need to project their longings and insecurities onto an all-knowing figure in the hopes their worries will disappear. As the novel proves doublethink is: "The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them...To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth." Therefore with the constant denial of both objective reality and the manipulation that instigates it we ultimately concern ourselves with the irrevocable dilemma: the state of those that present the façade and those that receive it. We are only participants in the façade for the sake of those who lie on the exterior. If there was no exterior or no observing body we would not partake in them as there would be no need to delve into various characters or personas. Thus society breeds falsehood through subtle layers of manipulation and subversion. Our own idiosyncrasies are lost in the utter conformity associated with modification of the self. Picture yourself without your façade – stripped to the bone of your core. Would be content in the depth of your self-deception? Do the lies you tell yourself sooth your inner insecurities? If the façade is successful, do not worry. Your mask is impenetrable, your shield of fragility intact. Your deception has endured the hardship of public inspection, the constraints of societal concerns and the innate longing for internal balance. The power to offset your own internal compass is frightening and strangely alluring. For if this blind ignorance to the truth could be sustained it would present admittedly interesting possibilities. However I am content to retain my own imperfections and to delight in the garden of my insecurities. I happily wonder the mazes of my own mind, safe in the knowledge it is as calculating and dynamic as ever. I treasure my telltale habits though I know they are the pet hates of my significant others. They are subsequently more telling of me in immeasurably colourful forms than any pretend conversation of disillusioned confrontation. To me, they are one of the few hallmarks of individuality. "To the future of to the past, to a time when thought is free, when men are different from one another and do not live alone – to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone” – page 30, “1984” by George Orwell Pretence is useful, undeniably so. But it is the honest and vulnerable ones who truly see beyond the mask. Treasure the rewards of the multi-faceted lifestyle , the fruits of honesty are invariably unattainable to those who are unwilling to forage for them.
|
|||||
|
|